News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Minister blows away Shooters Bill 

Minister blows away Shooters Bill

18 Aug, 2009 08:39 AM
IT is amazing now with the internet how far this column actually travels outside of the Macleay.

People horrified by the Shooters Party ‘Game and Feral Animal Control Amendment Bill 2009’ have contacted me from all over NSW and even Tasmania regarding articles printed here.

It turns out that not only are these correspondents totally against any Game Council hunting in National Parks of native animals (and also feral animals), but they are writing to me about shooters invading their property and, thanks to Minister Ian Macdonald, appearing at any time in State Forests designated for hunting.

One property owner has written to me claiming 13 incidents with hunters on his property in 2006-7.

These incidents have involved people armed with firearms lost outside his house at 5am, shooters having target practice and leaving rubbish on his property, shooters picnicking, shooting near his house, entering his property with pig dogs without permission, a hunter with unlicensed friends cutting his fence to bypass his gate and even parking their cars on his property.

A lady involved with a pony club at Orange wrote to me describing how parents there will no longer allow their children to ride their horses in the State Forest because they never know when the shooters will be operating.

The NPWS released a media statement last month decrying the slaughter at Rollands Plains of kangaroos which were stacked up in a pile with beer cans shoved in their pouches.

Fortunately through the publicity in The Argus and Port News someone has come forward with names. It will be interesting to see if those responsible actually had shooters licences and permission to be there.

A reader sent me clippings of a hunter shot in the back last year by his mate near Bourke and admitted to Dubbo Base Hospital in a stable but critical condition.

Last December a 13-year-old boy at Orange had an arrow removed from his chest. He recovered but the wide blade hunting arrows are meant, obviously, to kill.

I wrote recently, satirically, that soon hunters might be able to experience the thrill of bringing down a charging wombat in National Parks.

I have just received a photograph of a wombat transfixed by such an arrow and left beside the road.

These arrows are usually retrieved and one wonders whether the animal crawled away to die in agony or was just left there to make some sort of sick statement.

Be very aware we are not talking here about farmers protecting their livestock or crops from feral animals.

There are people out there with a very different mindset to the average person.

It seems the Shooters Party might regret moving this Bill, which resulted in the closing of State Parliament when the Shooters refused to support Labor’s legislation.

It seems the furore has brought out not only public uproar over the threat to native animals in National Parks, but also unleashed the growing dissatisfaction amongst users of our State Forests who feel threatened already by shooters, and concern from farmers who are constantly encountering shooters on their property or cars with shooters driving at night on roads near them.

You can often see the bullet holes in RTA fauna warning signs.

It seems the Shooters Party may have lost their battle to get into National Parks.

I received a very welcome letter from NSW Minister for Climate Change and the Environment, Carmel Tebbutt, on that topic.

Ms Tebbutt writes that “… the Government does not support hunting in national parks or the hunting of native animals, including waterbirds, on conservation or other grounds.

“Making national parks available for incompatible purposes like hunting threatens to undermine their value to existing users, including families and visitors to our State.

“Where native species do need to be managed, for example to mitigate damage to property or crops, existing regulatory provisions allow this to occur under strict controls.

“The Department of Environment and Climate Change also undertakes strategic feral animal control programs in national parks.

“The NSW Government is committed to the important role of our national parks and reserves in achieving our natural resource targets to conserve native flora, fauna and wetlands, increase opportunities for nature based recreation and tourism and improve community wellbeing.”

This is a very significant and courageous statement by the Minister.

This is not just an Environment Minister protecting fauna in our national parks. It will have serious ramifications for the Labor Party in NSW and for the Shooters Party.

If the Labor party stick by her on this it will cause a showdown with the Shooters Party, which holds the balance of power in the Upper House and can in effect prevent Labor from governing.

State Labor know a bloodbath awaits them in any election caused through a double dissolution at this stage, so where do they go with this?

For that matter it is not certain just where the Shooters Party stand on the prospect of another election.

They will have strengthened the redneck vote, but there will be an awful lot of hunters out there working with farmers on destroying foxes and wild dogs on an invitation basis who will not be very impressed with what this Shooters Bill is doing to their reputation without them in some cases being part of the consultation.

So there will likely be a deal to give the Shooters enough to save some face from their self-imposed debacle.

The general public, however, who do not have a vested interest in shooting things, will be wondering about single issue political parties who can hold the balance of power in our democratic system and hold our government to ransom on any legislation at all, not just their single interest.

Meanwhile for those of you who object to the Shooters Party Bill, you can sign the NSW Nature Conservation Council petition at www. naturensw.org./nohunting

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
single page

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This article reveals gross ignorance on the part of its author.

Double dissolutions are a Federal mechanism in the Australian Constitution, and do not apply to NSW parliament politics. The Labor party is the one which is going to need to save face. They seem to think that the tooth fairy passes legislation in the Legislative Council. The Greens are so unreasonable that they won't vote for most of Labor's legislation, and that makes the Shooters Party the bad guys? The last comments about single issue parties make no logical sense whatsoever. The Greens and the Coalition might not be single issue parties, but how does that give them the right to block legislation but no other party can do so? At least when you vote for the Shooters Party you know what they are going to do, all others do what they like once they have your vote.

Posted by Benjamin Franklin, 18/08/2009 9:48:36 AM, on Macleay Argus
The article displays more than political ignorance Benjmin.

As a conservation hunter I am appalled at how the author see's fit to imply a connection between hunters and the vandals responsible for the anecdotes (that is all they are) that this article attempts to exploit.

Imagine the reaction if the same tactics were used to link a particular crime to another demographic like aboriginals or maybe muslims.

It seems that the only fair game in the media these days are licenced hunters. Jeff Borg

Posted by Jeff Borg, 18/08/2009 12:21:31 PM, on Macleay Argus
The Shooter's Party is improving its chances of getting a third MLC through the use of hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to put its Chairman's face as the face of "voluntary conservation hunting" in rural papers.

Sorry, I meant Chairman of the Game Council, who's the ex-Chairman of the Shooter's Party. It's the Chairman of the Shooter's Party that is the ex-Chairman of the Game Council. Confused? Don't worry, so is the Game Council. It puts out media statements slamming those that object to this dangerous Bill.

A Statutory Authority using taxpayers funds to slam people with an objection to the Shooter's Party Bill? And funding campaign-style ads for its candidate Chairman? And awarding tenders to companies of which the Chairman has recently given up Directorships? Jo Bjelke had nothing on these guys.

Posted by gameguy, 18/08/2009 1:40:23 PM, on Macleay Argus
Leaving the hysterics aside, the fact remains that hunting in Victorian National Parks has been ongoing for many years. Hunting in National Parks is commonplace throughout the world Why is it that NSW is filled with paranoid, hoplophobic propagandists posing as journalists? The serial complainer with 13 incidents has an occupiers permit, which has allowed him to treat thousands of acres of public land, which borders his lease, as his own. When others have started using this public land he became very territorial and reactionary. Objectors to hunting in our forests often have a great deal of self interest to protect, such as having free use of grazing land in a State Forest, or free land to grow Marijuana Crops. A large number of people have been able to fly under the radar and use the Forests as their own until all those pesky outsiders had the temerity to show up and recreate on the public estate. Illegal hunting on State Forests occurred before the Game Council came into being. Criminals do what criminals do, whether there is a Game Council or not.
Posted by Cowboy Joe, 18/08/2009 11:06:58 PM, on Macleay Argus
You highlight an interesting point gameguy. We should wait and see in the next budget how much of taxpayers money the Game Council actually utilises and how much revenue the organisation generates. If it manages to achieve an average higer ratio of revenue than other government departments, what will you have to nitpick then? Further to that, you obviously believe that the ex-chairmans history is some conspiracy theory secret. So what exactly is your point? That the guy is employable and has bothered to develop some networks? Maybe you should just say good luck instead of peddling the tall poppy syndrome. Atleast the guy is actualy doing something about managing a real issue (regardless of what your or my opinion on it is). Feral and native animals need to be managed (either for their numbers and/or for their genetics): stop muddying the issue with nonsense. Oh, and if you want to mention the awarding of tenders that might be suspect, go to the ICC instead of gossiping on a website. People like you take merit in creating conflict, not trying to resolve and achieve a compromise.
Posted by neutral, 19/08/2009 10:10:56 AM, on Macleay Argus
The NSW Nature Conversation Council is not the only organisation opposed to this bill. Wildlife Advocate has established an online petition, prepared instructions and sample letetrs for those wishing to write to their local parliamentarians/the Premier, and has posted on its website a list of forthcomming public meetings. Go to www.wildlifeadvocate.com for more information Guy Wilmington President Wildlife Advocate
Posted by Wildlife Advocate, 19/08/2009 10:54:28 AM, on Macleay Argus
The kid who had the arrow removed, got the arrow in his chest, whilst using his bow in his backyard, when he tripped.

This incident is irrelevant to what is planned for National Parks.

The lady with the kid who rides his horse in the State forest ought to take a course in risk analysis.

Horse riding is many times more risky than shooting as a sport.

About $10 of every Game Licence issued goes to pay for insurance of up to $10million. Try getting insurance for injury up to $10 million for $10 for horse riding. Insurers are not stupid, they are out to make money not lose it. They are betting on getting no claims and have assessed the risk accordingly. But these people claim to be smarter than the insurance company actuaries.

Posted by Benjamin Franklin, 19/08/2009 7:14:21 PM, on Macleay Argus
"Neutral" - by now they were meant to be self-funding; nice to see you redefining the goal posts. Statutory authorities are not meant to act as campaign offices for political candidates; regardless of their funding source - your attitude that if they have some licnece income makes it all right for them to do whatever they like is exactly the thinking that got them into this corrupt situation (are you sure you are "neutral"?). By banning spot light hunting of deer, the game council and its chair have taken pest control back decades. They are into promoting feral animals, not controlling them.
Posted by gameguy, 19/08/2009 8:00:58 PM, on Macleay Argus
Gameguy, deer are not a feral animal. They are an introduced game animal and are managed. Species of deer such as Hog deer are even endangered in their natural habitat. Do you want them exterminated just because they are not native, how about you start with something actually causing extinctions first, like cats. The only area where deer are a problem is in national parks, and that is because curent leglislation gives them protection there. I also find it amusing that someone wont ride a horse in a state forest as there may be shooting there. Do they know how dangerous horses are compared to shooting, if they did they would be selling the horses. The author shows how far radicals will go trying to discredit hunters. Most of his examples are old and completly unrelated to hunting in state forests or national parks.
Posted by Chris, 21/08/2009 9:25:59 PM, on Macleay Argus
Wow what a mixed bunch of confusion and rubbish. Lets examine the facts. The fact is we live in a democracy and the rules apply equally to all parties. The fact is that 3 times as many people have petitioned in support of the bill compared to the wildlife advocacys poll. The fact is that a bullet is far more humane, ecologically friendly and selective than a bait. The fact is there are 10,000 competent volunteers offering their time to help solve just a part of the problem facing our environment, and philosophy is getting in the way.
Posted by DHV, 23/08/2009 8:01:30 AM, on Macleay Argus
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB43 plans 1%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 5%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 3%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

macleay valley coast


Macleay Argus







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...